The Laramee Filter: pseudorandom thoughts, subsequently put on the Internet.
 
Author:
Tom Laramee
Date Published:
Jul 5th, 2025
Word Count:
2,351 (15:00 read time)
Related:
Filed Under:

Addiction to Self-Righteousness via Conspiracy Theories and Propaganda

In Which We Find Ourselves In a Slowly-Unfolding Mental Health Crisis That's Largely, If Not Entirely, Unmentioned In Today's Socio-Political Environment.
 
Fast Forward To 2045

In many years[1], I'm completely convinced that the current time period be recognized for the onset of a new psychological disorder (circa DSM X[2]), which I'm tentatively calling "Addiction to Self-Righteousness via Conspiracy Theories and Propaganda" (ASR-CTP), in which the following characteristics/behavior are observed:

  1. Copious consumption of news from influencers and entertainers, i.e.: sources that never admit they're wrong, and never print a retraction, nor are beholden to any sort of ethical/moral guidelines to present information that resembles reality in any way, nor are held accountable at any point even when they're wildly incorrect.
  2. Your self-assuredness [in a false claim] actually increases when presented with evidence to the contrary.
  3. Cognitive sleight of hand when presented with evidence that's contrary to a belief, as a way to avoid facing/acknowledging the reality of a verifiable fact (e.g.: "But what about ____?").
  4. The delusion that "Only a select few people understand this [truth], and I'm one of them"[3].
  5. The delusion that your media sources are not lying to you (but everyone else's media sources are lying to them).
  6. The delusion that you're simply unable to be mislead (and that everyone else is).
  7. The delusion that you can know enough about a subject that you're quickly confident that you know "The Truth" about it, e.g.: (a) "Climate change is not caused by humans" (read: you're a climate scientist). (b) "Covid is fake" (read: you're an epidemiologist). (c) "Tariffs are paid by the exporting countries" (read: you're an economist). (d) "Vaccines don't work" (read: you're a doctor and an epidemiologist). (e) "Medicaid isn't being cut" (read: like you even read the fucking bill you phoney).
  8. The dismissal of your own claims that fail to materialize ("", "", "", etc ad infinitum, ad nauseam.
  9. The audacity to dismiss scientists (et al other specialists) via unsubstantiated claims similar to "", "", "", "", (etc).
  10. The dismissal of previous evidence that your news sources were wrong, and therefore you should be wary of trusting them now. (i.e.: remember when "Everyone who gets the COVID vaccine will be dead in 18 months"? If you believe them at the time, that's fine, but now you're obligated to dismiss them as a source that's wildly misleading when they make claims in the present).
  11. The inability to admit you're wrong, ever, about anything.
  12. The lording over those around you that they are all wrong, and that you're the only one who is correct[4].
  13. The addiction to the self-righteousness that accompanies statements like "" / "".
  14. The tendency to rewrite history to suit your current requirements ("")
  15. Taking whatever you're unwilling to admit you're doing and accusing others of doing it,. e.g.: "" (when you yourself are lying), "" (when you yourself are ignoring evidence), "" (while you yourself could do with a healthy dose of reality).
  16. The making of un-wise, harmful, and sometimes ruinous/fatal personal medical decisions based on advice / guidance from non-medical professionals. E.g.: skipping the measles vaccine because RFK Jr. told you "". E.g.: Every child's death from measles after their parents refused to vaccinate their child wit the MMR vaccine. Same with 10s of thousands of lives that could have been saved during Covid if people had simply taken the vaccine.

It will be classified as an addiction, because once you begin, you just get deeper and deeper, building ever more delicate, complex, and fragile systems of rationalization in an attempt to convince yourself of your own version of the truth, even while the behavior is harming both yourself and your primary relationships.

Here are some of the symptoms of addiction, tailored for disinformation paranoia:

If you've ever begun a non-sequitur with one of the following phrases:

... you likely suffer from this condition.

 
Like All Disorders, This One Will Have Comorbidities

Among the co-morbidities for this psychological disorder will be:

  1. Past trauma, unacknowledged and unprocessed (PTSD, CPTSD, loss of a child, etc).
  2. Neurodiversity: Asperger's, ASD, etc.
  3. A lack of adequate social support and/or familial support, leading to a general sense of "loss of [larger] purpose".
  4. Addiction to anger/rage.
  5. Any active substance use disorder.

In other words, certain people are actually predisposed to believing in conspiracy theories. My observation is that the angriest people I know are the most susceptible. My list of co-morbidities will turn out to be woefully incomplete; I'm only listing the obvious ones.

The foundational purpose of this disorder is an attempt to find meaning in a larger narrative... likely one that transcends you own life. You'll "hitch your wagon" to a larger cause, one that makes you think your life suddenly has meaning, and purpose. That's why one of the co-morbidities is a lack of adequate social support. It's also why it's so profoundly difficult for someone to realize the terrible consequences of this disorder: if you admit you're wrong you'll lose the [perceived] meaning you've brought to your life and it will once again become meaningless[5]

 
This Disorder Is Everywhere, and Is Having Profoundly Negative Consequences

I think what's most troubling to me personally, is that (a) this really is a psychological disorder and (b) it's playing out among our friends, relatives, and in the political realm. I used to feel much more free to say, in jest, things like "Well, there are people who truly believe 9-11 was an inside job" until I found out just how many people believe this to be true. It's no longer a joke, and if you say something similar, be prepared to be surprised by both (a) that someone you know is "a truther" and (b) that they believe their truth vehemently, passionately, and will simply not be dissuaded otherwise.

The rest of us are losing friends, and no longer speaking with family members, due to the incredibly fraught ideas of reality. What's real these days?

Good luck with all of that. One thing is for certain: you won't be able to establish a common understanding of what reality actually is if you know someone who believes that people are controlling the weather to selectively target say, south Texas, with floods.

And in the meantime, friends are being lost, and families torn apart, over our [collective] inability to believe in the same shared understanding of what's real.

And on a global stage, US legislators are proposing legislature based on conspiracy theories[6][7], and the head of HHS has a long history of promoting conspiracy theories[8]. It's difficult to get your head around the idea that public policy, and possibly global policy, might be based on a lie or a set of lies. Socially, conspiracy theories dominate huge swarths of social media[10] and there are countless examples of people outing themselves as proud flat-Earthers[11], or fascists / Nazi sympathizers[12].

And underlying it all is an as-yet-undiagnosed psychological disorder, which we're currently so steeped in we can't even see that it's there, so it'll take at least a generation to diagnose it.

 
Some Additional Reading

It's worth viewing the documentary Flight From Death: The Quest for Immortality, if you're interested in this sort of thing. Additionally, the book Money, Lies, and God: Inside the Movement to Destroy American Democracy is worth reading in it's entirety. Lastly, also worth a read in it's entirety is the essay: A Defense Against Gaslighting Sociopaths.

 
 
Footnotes:
[1] My guess is: approximately one generation. Nothing can happen while the current generation is afflicted by their current delusions. (E.g.: Think about the "Satanic Panic" from the 1980s. It took at least one generation to admit that everyone was wrong).
[2] The "The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" (DSM).
 
The DSM-I was published in 1952, followed by DSM-II in 1968, DSM-III in 1980, DSM-III-R in 1987, DSM-IV in 1994, DSM-IV-TR in 2000, DSM-5 in 2013, and DSM-5-TR in 2022
[3] Yes, "delusion" is the correct term here.
[4] If you've ever referred to someone, or a group of people, as "sheeple", this is almost certainly in reference to you.
[5] I believe this is why my MAGA friends no longer talk to me. In the past, they were totally happy to sit around and critique, with great enthusiasm, Obama, Biden, Harris, Pelosi, etc. No criticism was too small to list, and they delighted in these discussions. But when it came to doing similar to Trump, all criticism turns out to be verboten). They[8] could find one thing[8] that's wrong / negative / broken / criminal about Trump. It's very sad.
[6] Minnesota Republicans introduce legislation inspired by the chemtrails conspiracy theory.
[7] Marjorie Taylor Greene introduces ‘weather modification’ ban.
[8] A running list of RFK Jr.'s controversies and RFK Jr.’s Conspiracy Theories: Here’s What Trump’s Pick For Health Secretary Has Promoted.
[9] Literally.
[10] Alex Jones is the king of spreading conspiracy theories. Now, love him or hate him (I'm a lot close to the latter, but I mostly just feel pity for him) did figure out that Fear Sells / Anxiety Sells, and he exploited this magnificently and made 100s of millions of dollars. In essence, I believe he correctly (and adroitly) identified this psychological disorder and then proceeded to build a veritable empire with which he could take advantage of 10s of millions of vulnerable people.
[11] I'm going to pick on Lord Jamar here, which is a bit sad because he was part of a 90s hip hop group called Brand Nubian and they were great. He shows most of the signs of this delusion as he tries to defend the Flat Earth theory:
 
His confidence (arrogance) is profound. He's a self-proclaimed expert. He can't admit he's wrong. He changes the topic when backed into a corner. His dismissal of actual evidence is breathtaking. His self-righteousness is nauseating. He literally says "Whatever the money tells them to say". Also that the solar system doesn't exist (and nor do planets).
 
Crapping All Over Flat Earther Lord Jamar Live on Godfrey's Podcast.
 
I'll admit that Lord Jamar is sort of the inspiration for this blog post. In a few years, he will have been classified as suffering from a mental disorder.
[12] This one is insane*. This guy is a huge fan of autocracy and thinks the US should end elections and be run by a Catholic autocrat. Skip to 22:00 in this video. The guys literally says: "I'm not going to be a part of the group that he kills" (25:35) and "Yeah, I am [a fascist]" (26:20). The video is titled "1 Progressive vs 20 Far-Right Conservatives (ft. Mehdi Hasan)**".
 
 
* Personally, I think it's good that Connor was so clear about his beliefs.
 
In this way, we know what his end-game is: it's the installation of a Catholic autocrat to be the permanent president of the US, and this means the end of democracy. At least we now know what game we're all playing (so we plan accordingly).
 
I think it would be much worse if Connor was disingenuous, and merely hinted at his core beliefs. In that case, we wouldn't understand his end game.
 
It's a lot like racism. If you divided the expression of racism into two buckets (1) openly display your racism, in person and in public or (2) couch [hide] your racism in public, and in person, and then go online and post a bunch of racist comments anonymously.
 
Which one is better?
 
I'd argue that (1) is better, because otherwise, the targets of racism don't know who is targeting them. I'd argue it's better to know, than not know. In this way, it's actually nice to hear Connor be truthful.
 
 
** Also personally, I'd never agree to debate Mehdi Hasan because I'd lose. He's incredibly articulate and insightful. If I had to debate, I'd sure as hell make extensive preparations.